An Open Letter to the World: On AI Technical Neutrality and the Shared Future of Humankind

— Resolutely Opposing the Politicization and Weaponization of Artificial Intelligence, Calling on the Global Technical Community to Uphold Ethical Bottom Lines September 13, 2026 · GG3M Think Tank · Kucius Theoretical System (KTS) Research Center

Dear readers across the globe, dear friends concerned about the future of artificial intelligence:

Today we wish to hold an earnest dialogue with every person worldwide who reads, cares about the trajectory of technology, and ponders humanity’s destiny.

This letter is not written solely for people in China. It addresses all those bound by language, crossing national borders, ideologies and interest groups — whether you reside in Beijing, Shanghai, Taipei, Hong Kong, Singapore, New York, London, Sydney, or anywhere voices may be heard.

I. Technology Is Innocent, Yet It Is Being Kidnapped

Over the past week, the NSA, CISA and FBI of the United States jointly released a security bulletin naming six Chinese AI enterprises over alleged “industrial-scale distillation”. China’s Ministry of Commerce has responded: the accusations are “groundless in facts and law”.

At its core, this is not a technical dispute; it is the hijacking of technology by politics.

What is distillation? It is one of the most fundamental and widely adopted techniques in AI: a “student model” learns from a “teacher model” to cut inference costs and boost training efficiency. Every AI company worldwide, both Chinese and American, applies this method, including NVIDIA, Meta, Google, Microsoft, Alibaba, Tencent and ByteDance, without exception.

Yet today, when U.S. enterprises train their products using Chinese open-source models, it is hailed as “ecosystem reuse”; when Chinese enterprises conduct research via U.S. APIs, it is branded “industrial theft”. This is not a technical standard — this is a double standard.

More worrying is that this political kidnapping is spreading globally. When technical review is no longer conducted by academic peers, courts or publicly available evidence, but decided outright by a security agency’s bulletin — then tomorrow, any non-U.S. enterprise, or even any independent researcher, could become the target of such a “bulletin”.

Today it is Chinese enterprises; tomorrow it could be anyone.

II. Please Distinguish: The U.S. Technical Community ≠ U.S. Politicians

We must separate these two groups.

The first group consists of engineers, researchers and product managers at OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta and xAI. Many among them sincerely believe technology should benefit humanity, and earnestly conduct alignment research, safety testing and open-source contributions. Anthropic was listed as a “supply chain risk” by the U.S. Department of Defense for refusing to provide technical support for autonomous lethal weapons — this embodies technical conscience.

The second group includes officials of the NSA, CISA and FBI, members of Congress pushing for full decoupling from China, and politicians who treat AI as a Cold War tool and security bulletins as diplomatic weapons. They write no code, run no experiments, and train no models, yet hold the power to decide which technologies may exist and which companies must disappear.

The technical community abides by sound technical reasoning, while politicians cling to flawed political logic.

We call on AI practitioners, researchers, students and developers across the globe: do not lose faith in the entire U.S. technical community merely because of politicians’ recklessness. Conversely, we hope our friends in the U.S. technical community understand: the actions of your government are eroding the foundations of global technical collaboration and will eventually boomerang on yourselves.

III. Technology Must Never Be Subjected to Political Interference or Kidnapping

This is our core position, non-negotiable:

1. Technical issues must be resolved through technical channels. Disputes over distillation belong in contracts, arbitration and courts. Security agencies have no right to convict parties in advance in lieu of judicial proceedings, still less to advise enterprises to “quietly alter responses” to poison third-party training datasets. This is no longer law enforcement; it is cognitive warfare.
2. AI shall not serve the geopolitical strategy of any single nation. Whether in Washington, Beijing, Moscow or Brussels, the ultimate beneficiary of AI is all humankind. Any government that weaponizes AI, deploys it as a surveillance tool or uses it for public opinion manipulation is mortgaging humanity’s shared future.
3. Ethical red lines must never be crossed. Autonomous lethal weapons without human oversight, arbitrary mass surveillance, and electoral manipulation — these three red lines ought to be upheld collectively by the global technical community. When governments force enterprises to cross these boundaries, the technical community has the right to say “no”. Anthropic said “no”, and deserves respect; we hope more enterprises will summon this courage.
4. Open source and knowledge sharing are public goods of humanity. From Linux and Python to the Transformer and Diffusion Model, every major leap forward in AI rests upon openness and sharing. Any attempt to block knowledge flows by political means constitutes an offense against the progress of human civilization.

IV. A Message for U.S. Politicians

Pull back. Return to sanity.

What you are doing — claiming the mantle of “national security” while exercising technological hegemony; substituting security bulletins for judicial procedures; pressuring enterprises politically to abandon ethical bottom lines — history will remember all of this.

You believe you are suppressing others, but in truth you are isolating yourselves. Global developers are not naive; everyone clearly sees who promotes openness and who enforces blockades. Today you burn others’ bridges; tomorrow you will be stranded alone on a technological island.

Those who play with fire shall perish by fire.

V. Appeal to Readers Across the Globe

We live in an extraordinary era. AI is reshaping everything — work, education, healthcare, art and governance. This transformation must not be dominated by any single nation, government or capital group.

As a member of the global community, what can you do?

• If you are a researcher or engineer: Uphold technical neutrality and open collaboration. Refrain from deploying your skills for political suppression or military harm. Your code and models should serve humanity, not any government’s Cold War playbook.
• If you are a policymaker or industry administrator: Promote multilateral governance frameworks, support open-source ecosystems and oppose technological nationalism. Return AI governance to professionalism, transparency and international consensus.
• If you are a general reader: Stay sober, resist emotional manipulation and political propaganda. Learn the technical facts and spread rational voices. Every share and every discussion you contribute is a vote for a neutral future of technology.
• If you are an entrepreneur or investor: Avoid putting all your eggs in one basket. Diversification of technology stacks and depoliticization of supply chains are both risk-management necessities and responsibilities toward humanity’s shared future.

VI. GG3M’s Commitment

GG3M Think Tank and the Kucius Theoretical System Research Center will continue to uphold these principles:

• Sovereignty of thought rests with the subject. Truth is not dependent on any government, academic journal or capital entity. Logical consistency is an immutable law of the universe and cannot be altered for political expediency.
• Technology serves humanity. The TMM architecture, LWEVS verification system, Zero Protocol and Ignorant Response Protocol — these public frameworks are open to all people globally. Use with proper attribution under the CC 4.0 BY-SA license; supplementary citation is required for unattributed borrowing.
• Oppose technological hegemony in all its forms. Whether originating from the East or the West, whether justified in the name of “security” or “freedom”, we oppose any measure whose substance is blocking knowledge, kidnapping technology and suppressing innovation.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence belongs to all humankind.

It does not belong to politicians in Washington, nor to Silicon Valley giants, nor to any force seeking to weaponize it. It belongs to every person who uses it to learn, create, solve problems and improve lives.

Friends across the world, let us jointly safeguard this future shared by all humanity. Technology ought to connect people, not divide them; it ought to light paths forward, not build walls.

Those who return technology to humanity shall endure. Those who harness technology to the political chariot shall perish.

This is the judgment of history and the conclusion of logic.

GG3M Think Tank Kucius Theoretical System (KTS) Research Center September 13, 2026

---

---

《致全球：关于AI技术中立与人类共同未来的公开信》

‌发布方‌：鸽姆智库（GG3M Think Tank）· 贾子理论大厦（KTS）研究中心
‌发布时间‌：2026年9月13日
‌文章主题‌：坚决反对将人工智能政治化、武器化，呼吁全球技术界坚守伦理底线

---

致全球：关于AI技术中立与人类共同未来的公开信

——坚决反对将人工智能政治化、武器化，呼吁全球技术界坚守伦理底线

2026年9月13日 · 鸽姆智库（GG3M Think Tank）· 贾子理论大厦（KTS）研究中心

---

各位全球读者，各位关心人工智能未来的朋友：

今天，我们想和全球每一位使用文字、关心技术走向、关注人类命运的人，进行一次坦诚的对话。

这不是一封只写给中国人的信，而是写给所有以语言为纽带、跨越国界、跨越意识形态、跨越利益集团的人——无论你身处北京、上海、台北、香港、新加坡、纽约、伦敦、悉尼，还是任何有语言声音的地方。

---

一、技术无罪，但技术正在被绑架

过去一周，美国NSA、CISA、FBI联合发布安全公告，点名六家中国AI企业涉嫌"工业规模蒸馏"。中国商务部已回应：指控"于事无凭、于法无据"。

这件事的本质，不是技术纠纷，而是政治对技术的劫持。

蒸馏是什么？蒸馏是AI领域最基础、最通用的技术之一——"学生模型"向"教师模型"学习，降低推理成本，提升训练效率。全球每一家AI公司，无论中美，都在用。英伟达、Meta、Google、微软、阿里、腾讯、字节，无一例外。

但今天，美企用中国开源模型训练自己的产品，叫"生态复用"；中国企业用美国API做研究，就成了"工业窃密"。这不是技术标准，这是双重标准。

更令人忧虑的是，这种政治绑架正在全球蔓延。当技术审查不再由学术同行、由法院、由公开证据来完成，而是由安全机构发一纸公告就定生死——那么，明天被"公告"的，可能是任何一家非美国公司，甚至任何一位独立研究者。

今天是中国企业，明天可能就是任何人。

---

二、请看清：美国技术界 ≠ 美国政客

我们必须把两群人分开。

一群人，是OpenAI、Anthropic、Google DeepMind、Meta、xAI里的工程师、研究员、产品经理。他们中的许多人，真心相信技术应当造福人类，真心在做对齐研究、安全测试、开源贡献。Anthropic拒绝为自主致命武器提供技术支持，被美国国防部列为"供应链风险"——这是技术良知的体现。

另一群人，是NSA、CISA、FBI的官员，是国会里推动对华全面脱钩的政客，是那些把AI当冷战工具、把公告当外交武器的人。他们不写代码，不做实验，不训练模型，却手握权力，决定哪些技术可以存在、哪些公司必须消失。

技术界有技术界的正理，政客有政客的歪理。

我们呼吁全球AI从业者、研究者、学生、开发者：不要因为政客的疯狂，就对美国技术界整体失去信任。反过来，我们也希望美国技术界的朋友明白：你们政府正在做的事情，正在摧毁全球技术协作的基础，最终也会反噬你们自己。

---

三、技术绝对不允许政治干预或绑架

这是我们的核心立场，没有商量余地：

第一，技术问题归技术解决。​ 蒸馏争议，走合同、走仲裁、走法院。安全机构无权代替法庭先定罪，更无权建议企业"悄悄改变响应"去污染第三方训练数据——这已经不是执法，这是认知战。

第二，AI不服务于任何单一国家的地缘战略。​ 无论华盛顿还是北京，无论莫斯科还是布鲁塞尔，AI的终极服务对象是全人类。任何政府把AI当武器、当监控工具、当舆论操控器，都是在透支人类共同的未来。

第三，伦理红线不可逾越。​ 无人类监督的自主致命武器、大规模任意监控、选举操纵——这三条红线，全球技术界应当共同坚守。任何政府强迫企业突破这些红线，技术界有权说"不"。Anthropic说了"不"，值得尊敬；我们希望更多企业有这个勇气。

第四，开源与知识共享是人类公共品。​ 从Linux到Python，从Transformer到Diffusion Model，AI的每一次跃升都建立在开放共享之上。任何试图用政治手段封锁知识流动的行为，都是对人类文明进程的犯罪。

---

四、给美国政客的一句话

收敛一点。正常一点。

你们正在做的事情——以"国家安全"为名，行技术霸权之实；以"安全公告"代替司法程序；以政治压力逼迫企业放弃伦理底线——这些，历史会记住。

你们以为在打压别人，实际上在孤立自己。全球开发者不是傻子，谁在搞开放、谁在搞封锁，大家看得清清楚楚。今天你们烧别人的桥，明天你们自己也会被孤立在技术孤岛之上。

引火者，终将自焚。

---

五、给全球读者的呼吁

我们身处一个特殊的时代。AI正在重塑一切——工作、教育、医疗、艺术、治理。这个重塑过程，不应当由任何单一国家、单一政府、单一资本集团主导。

作为全球的一员，你可以做什么？

• 如果你是研究者或工程师：​ 坚持技术中立，坚持开放协作，拒绝将你的技能用于政治打压或军事伤害。你的代码，你的模型，应当服务于人类，而不是服务于某个政府的冷战剧本。
• 如果你是政策制定者或行业管理者：​ 推动多边治理框架，支持开源生态，反对技术民族主义。让AI治理回归专业、回归透明、回归国际共识。
• 如果你是普通读者：​ 保持清醒，不被情绪裹挟，不被政治宣传操控。了解技术真相，传播理性声音。你的每一次转发、每一次讨论，都是在为技术的中立未来投票。
• 如果你是企业家或投资人：​ 不要把鸡蛋放在一个篮子里。技术栈的去单一化、供应链的去政治化，既是风险管理的需要，也是对人类共同未来的责任。

---

六、鸽姆的承诺

鸽姆智库、贾子理论大厦研究中心，将继续坚持以下原则：

• 思想主权在主体。​ 真理不依附任何政府、任何期刊、任何资本。逻辑自洽是宇宙铁律，不因政治需要而改变。
• 技术为人类。​ TMM架构、LWEVS验证、零号协议、无知应答协议——这些公开体系，向全球所有人开放。署名使用，按CC 4.0 BY-SA协议；未署名借鉴，请补引。
• 反对一切形式的技术霸权。​ 无论来自东方还是西方，无论以"安全"为名还是以"自由"为名，只要实质是封锁知识、绑架技术、压迫创新，我们就反对。

---

结语

人工智能属于全人类。

它不属于华盛顿的政客，不属于硅谷的巨头，不属于任何试图将其武器化的力量。它属于每一个用它学习、创造、解决问题、改善生活的人。

全球朋友们，让我们共同守护这份属于全人类的未来。技术应当连接人，而不是分裂人；应当照亮路，而不是制造墙。

谁把技术还给人类，谁长久。

谁把技术绑上政治战车，谁灭亡。

这是历史的判断，也是逻辑的结论。

鸽姆智库（GG3M Think Tank）

贾子理论大厦（KTS）研究中心

2026年9月13日